King william i

King William I         Americans these days be too spoiled. e earthcipation and abomination are far too rampant. What perpetually happened to the respectable hoar days of unkind, bloodthirsty monarchs? Rulers who would send the citizens quivering with the innocent call forth of their names. Kings whose wanton cruelty and disregard for hu gentle adult males gentle piece life blithe and amused us all. There is friend occasion, and one(a) function alone, that we as a nation motivating to return us to the subservient, useless entities that we truly are. That one thing is a male monarch. What remediate reality for the job than William Jefferson Clinton?         A capacityiness and Bill Clinton are so utterly confused that I drive in I must choke crazy, but just embrace this idea, hitherto ludicrous it whitethorn sound, for just a moment. I correspond think approximately it. Would it be that such(prenominal) of a trade? Clinton is already, by far, the or so fibrous man in the universe. let us just analyze the things that made a king and the things that edge Bill Clinton.         First of all, a king was suitable to engage war with whomever he wanted, with come on the benediction of a legislative body. Is that non what Clinton did preliminary this year? We waged a war with a country tens of thousands of miles past under the flag of NATO, which Clinton practically controls allway. He used the coupled Nations as an excuse to intervene in something that didnt concern us because it was in the best interests of mankind as a entirely. That was not unlike the Treaty of Vienna in the 19th century. The compliance basically gave the virtually big businessmanful nations in Europe the just to intervene and interfere in any conflict or uprising that was deemed harmful to the rest of Europe. The treaty was written by countries where, by and large, monarchy was still prevalent. So it would not be much of a change to just defecate Cl! inton a king because he is already the virtually advocateful man in the universe.         Kings were also able to enact any polices they saw fit, again, without the approval of a legislative body. Has Clinton not through this already? relegate the partial-birth abortion law for example. right away I support a womans unspoiled to abort her child but, in my opinion, this goes too far. This regularity of contraception was overwhelmingly opposed by twain the folk and Senate, both Republican controlled. The Republicans did everything in their cater to defeat this bill. However, on come Bubba and all of a sudden women have the right to have this atrocity performed on their partly born child. This power makes Clinton one step closer to being a king. So why not make it ordained? He is already the almost powerful man in the universe.         Kings were also higher up the law itself. No king was ever removed for faulting a law. Neither was Clint on. He has rugged numerous law and committed traitorous acts during his presidency. For example the Whitewater thing. He abused his power as Arkansas state governor to further a multi-million dollar real estate study it on in which he was going to profit immensely. Was he charged? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has repeatedly accepted nonlegal campaign contributions from former(a) nations in commute for favors. Take the Chinese businessmen for example. Their illegal contributions served as snag on the Lincoln bedroom. That sordid miniature act has ruined the prestige of the Lincoln bedroom, perhaps forever. Was he charged or even reprimanded. No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has also repeatedly sold American patents to the Chinese. Again, was he reprimanded? This traitorous act was treat by both the American justice system and the American peop le. Want to bop why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the! most powerful man in the universe.

         permit us not forget the whole impeachment fiasco. Clinton admittedly committed perjury in a dethronement to the grand jury in the Paula Jones internal harassment baptistery (which I will get to later). lying under hex is a felony. Was Clinton charged, removed from office, or even formally reprimanded? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         Which brings me to my utmost point: marital infidelity and moral equivocalness. Kings were cruel and unpitying and concubines were rampant in the royal court. Back then if one was powerful, mistresses were looked upon as an unnecessary evil. Did that not already happen with Clinton?          allow us go through the list of some of the women he has had either sex with or has sexually harassed. The three most famous names are Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, and the now infamous Monica Lewinsky. Was he punished for his infidelity? Of course not. We even reelected him. Want to pick out why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         A fine example of his moral ambiguity is the whole marijuana thing. This was before we even elected him. He admittedly smoked an illegal substance. Was he punished? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe. some(a) competency say to impeach him or just to ask this out because he is leaving in just over a year anyway. However, I say no to this because he might be replaced with someone just as stinking or worse, such as Al Gore, the most dense man in the country. We made the! mistake once, we can make it again. The provided available solution is to make him our unquestioned lord and master, Now I ask, is that so bad? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay