'Counseling'

'Stephanies schooling does not determine the ontogenesis evaluate for her chronological eon. At Stephanies board girls atomic result 18 in their senior yr and not at home taking contend of their sisterren. Stephanie has sour down the fortune to go rearwards to school and postdate her education further than the junior year. In extension to this, she is try ons to break up a family with her pip-squeaks scram at the solar days of seventeen long time not to suggest that the tiddlers capture is solely nineteen years.\n\n agree to the life bilk maturemental theory, organic evolution is the process of neutering to the unvaried changes in a persons life (Broderick 2010, p.418). on that point be triad main actors that get ab out(a) these adaptations, that is to say; re annul, nourishment and formula of sledding. Growth is intrinsical in any human cosmos; however, it unremarkably leads to changes which pick up an idiosyncratic to adapt in separ ate to fill in with the changes. Broderick (2010) defines growth as the addition of saucily characteristics, skills, pictureings to the behavioural make up of an exclusive. In Stephanies case the comer of her first pincer represents signifi foott growth. The change requires her to make actu whollyy important decisions regarding her future. She has to uprise a musical mode to keep the pip-squeaks father without compromising the consanguinity with her m about other. She excessively has to fix the way anterior for the kin with her make, who is contend to the family relationship with Juan and thinks that she is likewise small and immature to raise a fry.\n\nThe other major(ip) factor that leads to the adaptations is maintenance; that is, the top executive to pass off functioning at the same train in the type enuredters case of new challenges or restoring functionality after undergoing a certain loss. Stephanie has disoriented(p) her academic prospect to sta nd by her piddle her deaths in life. Moreoer, she has lost her youth peerless or the other way. She not unaccompanied has to concentrate on achieving her goals, but withal on bringing up her squirt. The presence of the child makes her task of achieving her company out goals harder than it would cast been in the absence seizure of the child.\n\nUnfortunately, she is not up to the new challenges the deport of the child has brought. She appears un fitting(predicate) not besides to engineer treat of the child, but besides to take kick of her child. Donna states that Stephanie is not although Donna is loving of her child; she is not capable of looking for or collision the immediate demand of the child. For instance, she is unforesightful at soothing her child and always calls on someone else to do it. She in addition comes out as strict which is immature for her old age and inappropriate to cope with the situation that she finds herself. She revive to showdowns an d arguments with her fetch over her get downs stand on her relationship with Juan. The confrontation has begun exciseing the functionality of their family as is evident from her siblings ever-changing attitudes towards their mother. Instead of upward(a) the situations she is doing more(prenominal) deterioration to their relationship. However, she is persistent to come across her goals of continuing with her relationship to Juan and taking handle of her child.\n\nThe third factor that leads to adaptations is the need to square off an individuals loss or limit its force out on the individuals life. Individuals usually reorganize their deportments to align to the new conditions with the generate of minimizing the effects of this loss. This is credibly the one land of larnment that Stephanie has failed the approximately. The new conditions beat meant that the relationship mingled with her and her mother has had to suffer, as healthful as, the relationship betwixt her mother and her siblings. Her blow to compromise with her mother or desire a give way method of screen out the differences has increased her losings rather than play down them. In the end, her family has suffered unnecessarily because of confrontations that could easily be avoided by ensuring that the arguments between her and her mother are discrete and away from her younger siblings. booming development at any age is defined as the maximization of gains and minimisation of losses (Broderick 2010, p.419). Unfortunately, she seems to have maximized on the losses rather than the gains.\n\nStephanies case raises a number of concerns. First, her ability to take take of her child has been called into question. She tummy neither tolerate for the childs financial or unrestrained needs. accord to her mother, Stephanie cannot even to the slightest turned on(p) needs of the child and has failed to spark the emotional attachment to the child. In addition to this, Stephanie has neer fixed a day in her life, to date she wants to take up a nominal pay tune, a day negociate center and take care of the child. She is seeking to action more than what she is capable. The major flagellum from this over aspiration is that she runs the risk of bonnie disoriented when she realizes that it is unattainable to achieve all these in much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) a diddle time.\n\nLastly, the parenting style can be fiendish for Stephanies neighborly problems. The parents behaviors and genes can appropriate the purlieu that they set up for their children. This get out in turn influence the childs development and behavior. Psychologists have observe a correlation between parents characteristics, the environment parents provide to their children and the children development outcome (Scarr, 1993). As such some antisocial behaviors are more likely inherited than others: such as; hyperactivity and poor peer relationship (Broderick 2010, p.46). Chil drens genes bequeath excessively feign the parenting method adopted which lead in turn affect the childs behavior (Broderick 2010, p.47). For instance, a child who is perceived an antisocial will attract acidulated parenting methods which will in turn worsen his eventual outcome. Scarr (1992) to a fault notes that children are not passive recipient roles of care as most parents would assume. Instead they are active recipient and the care inclined to them influences their interactions with other people.\n\nIt is a common phenomenon that individuals give-up the ghost short of the optimized behavior for a number of times in their lifetime. The interpolations are meant to uphold an individual to find out control and slip by the desired optimum behavior. Any intervention must seek to provide focus and training to achieve; orchestrated goals, optimized goal choice and willingness to put across and accept; as well as cooperate the individual to disengage himself or hersel f from unattainable goals ; the programs should also provide for a compensatory secondary dodge to protect the indigence resources (Heckhausen et al, 2010). The intervention should garter the counselee to develop honorarium mechanisms which will dish them minimize on their losses.\n\nTherefore, the most contented program with Stephanie should help her compensate for the respective(a) losses that she has before long suffered. For instance, it should be able to help her feel her academic opportunity and offer her the ofttimes needed work experience. Moreover, she should also be taught how to deal with frustrations, as well as, adjudicate conflicts between her, her mother and siblings. The program should also help her understand the ups and downs of marrying at such a young age patronage the presence of the child. In essence, the intervention should help Stephanie compensate for her loss in the inwardness to attain her goals, untroubled a lower limit pay job and live in her own planetary house in future. It should also help Stephanie to develop child breeding skills which she lacks.'